🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Trend

In Europe, a growing number of states are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that phones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' youth". A law could be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged lawmakers to enact a bill lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended parents to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory statement calling for a ban for minors without parental consent is given. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a solid foundation," stated a leading European lawmaker driving the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Previously, support built behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. An organization founded by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after viewing disturbing platform posts contends that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are appropriate and suitable for young users," said a prominent peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, regulation is largely happening at the regional government level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a law limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed laws mandating adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from some individuals to mimic the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Views

Apart from the West, further states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies strike a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve safety.

While this international discussion evolves, the actions of this nation and its followers demonstrate that policymakers around the world are increasingly willing to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.